Grey literature includes any documentary material which is not published. While searching, I discovered Google Scholar which is “thought to provide increased access to gray literature, as it retrieves more than journal articles and includes preprint archives, conference proceedings, and institutional repositories” (Schultz). I tried using Google Scholar for the first time and was amazed by how many articles it found. Many of them were not full-text, but you could read the abstract and find what journal they were published in. This would then allow you to use a periodical index to find the specific article. I had never tried using Google Scholar and think that in certain situations it could be a valuable tool.
I also looked at an entry in Zillman’s blog, http://zillman.blogspot.com/2009/01/llrx-december-2008-issue-deep-web.html to read about the deep web. I was amazed to read that we can usually only search 20 billion of the 1 trillion pages on the world wide web. Overall, I think that this week has emphasized that we need to teach students that there is more than one way to search. They need to learn that just using “Google” is often not enough. It is important to use a variety of tools including databases in order to find the information we seek.
Schultz, Mary . "Comparing Test Searches In PubMed and Google Scholar." Journal of the Medical Library Association 95.4 (2007): 442-445. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Web. 10 July 2011.
Interesting isn't it? Sometimes I wonder whether we really want more information.
ReplyDeleteIn wanting to standardize tags, isn't it what librarians have always done with Sears and Library of Congress subject headings? What goes around...